A malicious prosecution claim: (AKA Fraud on the Court)

Pennsylvania law requires that a
plaintiff bringing a malicious prosecution claim must demonstrate
each of the following:
     (1) the defendant initiated criminal proceedings;
(2) the criminal proceedings ended in Plaintiffs’
favor;
(3) the proceedings were initiated without probable
cause; and
     (4) the defendant acted maliciously or for a purpose
other than bringing the plaintiff to justice.
Bradley v. General Accident Ins., 778 A.2d 707, 710 (Pa. Super.
2001).

  In order to state a claim for abuse of process, a plaintiff must  demonstrate that the defendant: (1) used a legal process against the plaintiff, (2) primarily to accomplish a purpose for which the      process was not designated, and (3) harm has been caused to the    plaintiff.  Douris, 229 F.Supp.2d at 404.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s